« Dan Metcalfe Quoted in NY Times on DOJ Morale | Main | Dispute Over Tennessee Ombudsman Plan »

July 31, 2007


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

M Sussman

One of the most important decisions in the opinion was that the Court rejected the Government's argument that Exemption 7(A) is subject to a lesser standard of proof.

Also, the Exemption 3 argument with respect to the grand jury documents now requires the Government to show that the materials were actually prohibited from disclosure by a specified person. In this case, the Government argued that Exemption 3 applied because the "grand jury" was considering the matter. The decision will require the Government to stop using such vague claims and actually show that the materials originated with the grand jury.

The comments to this entry are closed.