The Supreme Court has ruled 5-3 that recoverable actual damages under the Privacy Act do not include those from mental or emotional distress. The opinion, written by Justice Alito can be found here.
« DOJ and the FOIA | Main | More on DOJ and FOIA Portals »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c71b853ef01676457fa77970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Supreme Court Rules on What Actual Damages in Privacy Act Means:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
I am Fatemeh Ghanbari
Iranian lawyer and university professor
It was interesting
Thank you
Posted by: fatemeh ghanbari | March 28, 2012 at 02:12 PM
Sotomayor, Ginsburg, and Breyer dissent - go figure.
~Sarah
Posted by: Online Law Degrees | March 29, 2012 at 02:58 PM